Sample report
First-pass AI Act readiness snapshot
First-pass AI Act readiness snapshot: visible AI systems, likely risk class, public-surface gaps, and questions to ask counsel or a client.
Visible AI systems
Limited risk
Support chatbot
Public product pages describe an AI assistant that interacts directly with users.
Review needed
Lead scoring workflow
Marketing copy suggests automated prioritization but does not explain whether scores affect access, pricing, or human decisions.
Transparency obligation likely
Generated proposal summaries
Generated text is shown to customers, but no public AI-generated-content disclosure was found.
Public-surface gaps
High
Article 50
No visible AI interaction disclosure
The chatbot appears user-facing, but the reviewed pages do not clearly state that users interact with an AI system.
Medium
Articles 13-14
Human oversight unclear
Public materials do not explain who reviews AI-assisted outputs or when a human can override a workflow.
Medium
Governance evidence
No AI inventory signal
The site does not expose a policy, model card, system inventory, or compliance contact path for buyers.
Questions to ask counsel or the client
- Does the lead scoring workflow materially influence access, pricing, eligibility, or another important decision?
- Which AI outputs are shown directly to EU users, and which are internal-only?
- What logs are retained for AI-assisted decisions, overrides, and customer-facing generated content?
- Does the client use any vendor model or fine-tuned model that changes provider/deployer obligations?
Timeline note
High-risk rules now point to December 2, 2027 for many standalone high-risk systems and August 2, 2028 for high-risk systems embedded in regulated products.